Experimental Determination of the Structural Relaxation in Liquid Water
The investigation of large wavevector excitations in liquid water has
shown the existence of a positive dispersion in the velocity of sound. This
dispersion has been inferred in the pioneering computational [1]
and experimental [2] studies of the
dynamic structure factor, S(Q,E), and has been recently assessed by Inelastic
X-ray Scattering (IXS) [3]. Using IXS, the
transition of the longitudinal sound velocity from the adiabatic value,
co ~ 1500 m/s, to a value more than twice
larger, c ~ 3200 m/s, was studied at T = 5°C.
This sound velocity dispersion is qualitatively similar to that observed
in glass-forming liquids. There, the transition between the two dynamic
regimes is determined by the coupling of the propagating density fluctuations
with the dynamics of the structural rearrangements of the particles in the
liquid. The complex dynamics of such a rearrangement can be described by
a relaxation process with a characteristic time,
. The transition
takes place when the condition
~ 1 is fulfilled.
In glass-forming liquids
has a very steep temperature dependence;
its typical values are in the nanosecond range close to the melting point
and dramatically increases near the calorimetric glass transition temperature
Tg. This relaxation process (
-process) has a
cooperative nature and the density fluctuations are influenced differently
in the two opposite frequency limits: the system has a solid like elastic
behaviour for
>> 1, and a viscous one for
<< 1. One could speculate that also in liquid water the physical
mechanism responsible for the dispersion of the sound velocity is an
-relaxation process.
The experimental characterisation of the -process is typically
obtained by the determination of the dispersion of the sound velocity as
a function of T and at a constant Q transfer value. At the inflection point
"t" of such an "S"-shaped curve the condition
t(Q,T)
(T) ~ 1, with
(Q,T) = capp(Q,T) Q, is fulfilled. In
glass forming liquids, this condition is met by Brillouin Light Scattering
(BLS) measurements close to melting, and by Ultrasonic (US) methods close
to Tg. Indeed, the typical frequencies allowed
by these two techniques are such that
(Q,T)
(T) ~ 1 is met for
values of
in the 100 ps (BLS) and 1 µs (US) ranges. In
the case of water, as a consequence of the small value of
close to melting,
the BLS cannot access the relevant excitations energy region. The complete
determination of the "S"-shaped curve as a function of either
T or Q requires, however, the use of IXS [3].
This scenario has motivated an experiment on the ultrahigh energy
resolution inelastic X-ray scattering spectrometer of ID16 on the
temperature dependence of the transition from normal to fast sound in liquid
water in the T = 260-570 K and Q = 1-12 nm-1
regions. In order to emphasise the thermal effects, and to minimise the
modification of the hydrogen bond dynamics due to large variations of the
excluded volume, the density was kept in the range = 0.94-1.07 g/cm3. This was obtained adjusting the pressure in the
0-2 kbar range. The existence of a relaxation process is demonstrated by
Figure 52 which shows that the transition
between the two sound regimes takes place at increasing Q values with increasing
temperatures. The associated time-scale extends into the sub-picosecond
region with increasing temperature.
The analogy with the glass-formers phenomenology, implies that the fast
relaxation process studied in this work can be identified with an -process. The derived values of
are consistent with previous
estimations: they roughly follow an Arrhenius behaviour with an activation
energy comparable to the hydrogen bond energy. This suggests that, in water,
the
-process is associated with the rearrangement (making and breaking)
of molecular structures kept together by the hydrogen bond.
The IXS data were analysed both with an empirical model and with a visco-elastic
model, and in each case it was possible to determine the detailed T and
Q dependence of the relaxation time, .
References
[1] Rahman and Stillinger, Phys. Rev., A 10, 368 (1974).
[2] J. Teixeira, M.C. Bellisent-Funel, S.H. Chen, B. Doznez, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 54, 2681 (1985).
[3] F. Sette et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 850 (1995); Phys.
Rev. Lett., L77, 83 (1996).
Principal Publications and Authors
A. Cunsolo (a), G. Ruocco (b), F. Sette (a), C. Masciovecchio (a), A. Mermet
(a), G. Monaco (b), M. Sampoli (a), R. Verbeni (a), Phys. Rev. Lett.,
82, 775 (1999).
G. Monaco, A. Cunsolo, G. Ruocco, F. Sette, Phys. Rev., E 60,
5505 (1999).
(a) ESRF
(b) Università di L'Aquila and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica della Materia (Italy)
(c) Università di Firenze and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica della Materia (Italy)